Lorenzo v. Qualcomm Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding under the subheading, “Standing under the Cartwright Act,” that the Complaint fails to allege an antitrust injury, without discussing any “narrow exception” or “inextricable intertwining” at all
• recounting the plaintiffs allegations of anticompetitive harm including “supracompetitive prices and impaired non-price competition in innovation of CDMA functionality”
• “The California Courts have held that a plaintiff whose injuries ‘were not secondary, consequential, or remote, but the direct result of the unlawful conduct and were the kind of injuries the antitrust laws seek to prevent’ has antitrust standing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).