Skip to main content
· 5/30/2014

Lorenzo Roundtree v. United States

Citations

  • 751 F.3d 923
  • 2014 WL 2444505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a district court is required to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding an ineffective-assistance claim unless the record conclusively establishes either that counsel did not perform deficiently or that the defendant suffered no prejudice as a result
  • remanding for evidentiary hearing because record did not conclusively establish § 2255 movant was entitled to no relief
  • “A Section 2255 movant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing ... unless the motion, files, and record conclusively show he is not entitled to relief.”
  • “A Section 2255 petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing…unless the motion, files, and record conclusively show he is not entitled to relief.”
  • “A Section 2255 movant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing…unless the motion, files, and record conclusively show he is entitled to relief.”
  • “A Section 2255 movant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing . . . unless the motion, files, and record conclusively show he is not entitled to relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Smith, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.