Lorenzo Brandon v. Chicago Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Rule 60(b)(6) motion was appropriately considered as a Rule 60(b)(1) motion and was untimely
• concluding that correction under Rule 60(a
• if asserted grounds for relief fall under first three provisions of Rule 60, catchall provision is not available
• “[The order] accurately reflected the court’s intention at the time it was entered. Thus, the error, to the extent there was one, was not in the transcription, but in the court’s decision, a ground for relief not contained in Rule 60(a).”
• “[The order] accurately reflected the court’s intention at the time it was entered. Thus, the error, to the extent there was one, was not in the transcription, but in the court’s decision, a ground for relief not contained in Rule 60(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).