Lorene F. Murray v. Chicago Transit Authority and David Mosena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee being sexually harassed by a supervisor must utilize any mechanisms her employer has in place for addressing complaints of sexual harassment
• declining to resolve the issue of whether a plaintiff who rejects a sexual invitation from a supervisor has engaged in pro- tected conduct because the plaintiff did not show an adverse employment action
• “[W]e note that the standard of proof as to what constitutes sexual harassment under § 1983 is essentially the same as that under Title VII.” (citations omitted)
• two invitations to date do not amount to sexual harassment
• declining to resolve the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).