Skip to main content
· 11/7/2003

Loren F. Ex Rel. Fisher v. Atlanta Independent School System

Citations

  • 349 F.3d 1309
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22848
  • 2003 WL 22532941

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in IDEA cases, summary judgment is “appropriate even when facts are in dispute and is based on preponderance of the evidence.”
  • holding that in IDEA cases, summary judgment is “appropriate even when facts are in dispute and is based on preponderance of the evidence.”
  • noting that courts may deny reimbursement for private placement if parents act unreasonably or frustrate school's efforts
  • noting that courts may deny reimbursement for private placement if parents act unreasonably or frustrate school’s efforts
  • explaining that summary judgment under the Act “is based on a preponderance of the evidence” and the “usual” rule 56 “summary judgment princi- ples do not apply”
  • explaining the difference between the standard of review for motions for summary judgment and motions for judgment on the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Hull, Edenfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.