Lord v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the legitimate common purpose rule and noting that microscopic amounts of cocaine can be found on much of the currency circulating in south Florida
• adopting the legitimate common purpose rule and noting that microscopic amounts of cocaine can be found on much of the currency circulating in south Florida

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Reed
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-08-31· cited 14×
• Lupper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 6×
• People v. Nemecek
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-12-28· cited 5×
• Andrews v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-23· cited 3×
• Gilchrist v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-06· cited 3×
• Ortiz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-28· cited 2×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-18· cited 2×
• Duke v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-18
• Gilchrist v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-29

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Medlin
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-02-14· cited 56×
• State v. Eckroth
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1970-07-08· cited 31×
• State v. Dempsey
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1970-06-03· cited 20×
• United States v. One Gates Learjet
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-12-19· cited 16×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-19· cited 15×
• L.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-09· cited 11×