Lord v. Lord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the temporary setting prior to dissolution, section 61.16’s need and ability to pay test continues to apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-08· cited 13×
• Khan v. Khan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-01-11· cited 3×
• Simon v. Simon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-07

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Rosen v. Rosen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 318×
• Belcher v. Belcher
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1972-08-23· cited 80×
• Lashkajani v. Lashkajani
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-30· cited 44×
• Nichols v. Nichols
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-04· cited 43×
• Lashkajani v. Lashkajani
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-13· cited 8×