Lord v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this factor militated against striking a rebuttal report where the moving party had an opportunity to re-depose the expert prior to trial
• reasoning that rebuttal reports “may cite new evidence and data so long as the new evidence and data is offered to directly contradict or rebut the opposing party’s expert” (quotations omitted
• finding that reply reports addressing issues not raised on rebuttal to be improper
• noting that the opportunity to depose an expert can cure prejudice
• “The function of rebuttal evidence is to explain, repel, counteract or disprove evidence of the adverse party.”
• “The function of rebuttal evidence is to explain, repel, counteract or disprove evidence of the adverse party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).