Lord v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while Chevron deference applies to precedential, three-member Board decisions, it does not apply to single-judge Board decisions that do not rely on precedent
• holding that while Chevron deference applies to precedential, three-member Board decisions, it does not apply to single-judge Board decisions that do not rely on precedent
• determining Chevron deference applied to 1 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S. Ct. 2778 (1984
• “The Supreme Court has [ ] instructed that the ‘principles of Chevron deference are applicable’ to the BIA ‘as it gives ambiguous statutory terms concrete meaning through a process of case-by-case adjudication.’ ”
• “The Supreme Court has [ ] instructed that the ‘principles of Chevron deference are applicable’ to the BIA ‘as it gives ambiguous statutory terms concrete meaning through a process of case-by-case adjudication.’”
• “[W]e find that the ‘lawfully resided continuously’ requirement in 212(h) is ambiguous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).