Lord v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that although the Commissioner is not required to refer to every piece of evidence in his decision, the Commissioner may not ignore relevant evidence, particularly when it supports the claimant’s position
• failure to address specific piece of evidence did not undermine validity of ALJ conclusion, when supported by citations to record and the unaddressed evidence was cumulative
• “For a reviewing court to be satisfied that an ALJ's decision was supported by substantial evidence, 11 that decision must take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).