Skip to main content
· 3/15/1990

LORD JEFF KNITTING COMPANY, INC. v. Lacy

Citations

  • 393 S.E.2d 55
  • 195 Ga. App. 287
  • 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Tjhere can be no recovery in quantum meruit where an express contract governs all the claimed rights and responsibilities of the parties.” (emphasis added)
  • although commissions were payable based on goods shipped and there was a lack of specific shipping documentation, there was evidence sufficient for jury to estimate damages with a reasonable certainty
  • “while the parties may plead in alternative counts, there can be no recovery in quantum meruit where an express contract governs all the claimed rights and responsibilities of the parties.”
  • “While the parties may plead in alternative counts, there can be no recovery in quantum meruit where an express contract governs all the claimed rights and responsibilities of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooper, Deen, Birdsong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.