Lorber v. Beebe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Barnes to dismiss plaintiff’s § 11 claim when plaintiff could not prove whether he held “old” or “new” stock
• “Unique affirmative defenses that require some individualized inquiry do not present a per se bar to certification.”
• “[I]t is insufficient that stock ‘might’ have been issued pursuant to a defective statement.”
• general rule limits action to purchaser’s immediate seller

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).