· 3/7/1995
Loral Terracom v. Valley National Bank, a Federally Chartered Bank Citizens Bank Trust Co., a Kentucky Corporation and State Chartered Bank
Citations
- 49 F.3d 555
- 40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,777
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1716
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 3036
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4365
- 1995 WL 90482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the “but for” test was not satisfied where information furnished by defendant was only one part of an independent evaluation.
- adding that “‘the foreseeability that is 10 || critical to due process analysis ... is that the defendant’s conduct and connection with the forum 11 State are such that he should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there’”
- affirming district court’s denial of discovery where “a plaintiff’s claim of personal jurisdiction appears to be both attenuated and based on bare allegations in the face of specific denials made by defendants”
- second prong satisfied if \but for\ alleged contacts, cause of action would not have arisen
- second prong satisfied if “but for” alleged contacts, cause of action would not have arisen
- “The 7 purposeful availment standard requires more than foreseeability of causing injury in another 8 state.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Choy, Farris, Brunetti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.