California Court of Appeal· 11/8/1985
Loral Corp. v. Moyes
Citations
- 174 Cal. App. 3d 268
- 219 Cal. Rptr. 836
- 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2738
Judges: Agliano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-08-07· cited 202×
- Saunders v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-02-28· cited 78×
- Amn Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Servs., Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-11-01· cited 59×
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1986-11-17· cited 47×
- Jensen v. Hewlett-Packard Co.California Court of Appeal· 1993-03-30· cited 47×
- Lombardo v. HuysentruytCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-09-12· cited 44×
- Lussier v. San Lorenzo Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-11-23· cited 42×
- WeRide Corp. v. Kun HuangN.D. California· 2019-03-22· cited 35×
- Atmel Corp. v. VITESEE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2001-02-15· cited 34×
- Soap Co. v. Ecolab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1994-09-16· cited 33×
- ITT Telecom Products Corp. v. DooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-09-26· cited 32×
- Six Dimensions, Incorporated v. Perficient, IncorpFifth Circuit· 2020-08-07· cited 32×
- Thompson v. Impaxx, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2003-12-08· cited 29×
- In Re Marriage of Sabine M. and Toshio M.California Court of Appeal· 2007-07-31· cited 22×
- Bresnahan v. Chrysler Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1995-02-14· cited 18×
- Hamilton v. Gage Bowl, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1992-06-04· cited 18×
- VL SYSTEMS, INC. v. Unisen, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2007-06-25· cited 17×
- Wheeler v. Raybestos-ManhattanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-07-28· cited 17×
- John F. Matull & Associates, Inc. v. CloutierCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-09-16· cited 16×
- Communication Technical Systems, Inc. v. DensmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-08-05· cited 15×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationNinth Circuit· 1983-07-12· cited 333×
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-04-06· cited 188×
- Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court· 1984-09-13· cited 181×
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. GlenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-03-17· cited 133×
- Maryland Metals, Inc. v. MetznerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-02-01· cited 122×
- Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court· 1965-01-19· cited 105×
- Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-03-20· cited 105×
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1980-06-02· cited 97×
- Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-04-11· cited 95×
- John Roane, Inc. v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware· 1952-06-12· cited 91×
- Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-07-08· cited 84×
- Swenson v. FileCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-10-29· cited 75×
- Huang v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-08-16· cited 60×
- Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court· 1937-12-29· cited 59×
- Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court· 1955-01-14· cited 53×
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-09-30· cited 52×
- Timmsen v. Forest E. Olson, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1970-04-23· cited 41×
- Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.California Supreme Court· 1937-09-20· cited 40×
- Gregory v. SpiekerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-11-23· cited 40×
- Gordon v. LandauCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-02-14· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.