Lorah v. Luppold Roofing Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Whether a peculiar risk exists is a matter for the court to decide before submission to the jury.”
• because many if not all industrial accidents result from the failure to follow safety regulations, a violation of safety conditions alone cannot be the basis for finding that the Peculiar Risk Doctrine applies
• “[T]he tenor of our law is that the violation of safety conditions alone cannot be the basis for a finding that the Peculiar Risk Doctrine applies, as many, if not most, industrial [accidents] result from a failure to follow ... safety regulations.”
• “[T]he tenor of our law is that the violation of safety conditions alone cannot be the basis for a finding that the Peculiar Risk Doctrine applies, as many, if not most, industrial [accidents] result from a failure to follow ... safety regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).