LoPresti v. Rutland Regional Health Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the well-established rule that promissory estoppel will not apply when the relationship of the parties is governed by a contract”
• termination for refusing to violate state law and formal professional ethical code to the detriment of the public would satisfy the public policy exception
• enumerating exceptions to at-will doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).