Lopez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state's evidence deemed sufficient to establish that defendant was conducting a bolita lottery at bar; conviction for conducting lottery upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Meade v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-02-22· cited 33×
• Birge v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1957-02-20· cited 32×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-26· cited 24×
• Russell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-08-29· cited 23×
• Faulk v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1958-07-25· cited 17×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-04-10· cited 14×
• Raysor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-02-12· cited 11×
• Farrington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-03-05· cited 9×
• Kish v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-05-09· cited 9×
• Townsend v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1957-10-29· cited 8×
• Stanger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-01-28· cited 7×
• Trimble v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-05-13· cited 6×
• Navarro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-05-30· cited 6×
• Green v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1955-06-03· cited 5×
• State v. Joiner
  Miami-Dade County Circuit Court· 1961-01-18· cited 4×
• Wright v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-05-02· cited 3×
• Gainey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1956-10-05

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Collins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-03-31· cited 67×
• Boynton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-04-07· cited 36×
• Simpson v. Goldworm
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1952-06-13· cited 18×