Lopez v. Ruhl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court “discovered no cases in which the results of a polygraph voluntarily undertaken by an individual under suspicion were used to support a probable cause finding,” but in the context of the case could carry “some slight weight”
• “negligence in failing to prevent the constitutional deprivation may suffice to support a § 1983 claim”
• \[T]he right to consortium is not within the spectrum of interests guaranteed by the Constitution or federal law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).