Lopez v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing period of claimant’s treatment designed to improve condition and alleviate pain as period of recuperation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rios v. Fred Teitelbaum Const.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-30· cited 16×
• Baggett v. MULBERRY CONST. CO.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-31· cited 5×
• Keller Kitchen Cabinets v. Holder
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-16· cited 5×
• ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL BD. v. Melman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-25· cited 4×
• MacKin v. Olde World Cheese Shop
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-14· cited 4×
• Inn Service Corp. v. Diaz-Aller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-16· cited 2×
• Avery v. City of Coral Gables
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-07· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coq v. Fuchs Baking Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-05· cited 21×
• Morris v. Metal Industries
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-09· cited 18×
• Defrees v. Colt and Dumont/Hit Sales
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-27· cited 16×
• Delgado v. LaQuinta Motor Inns
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-11· cited 6×