Lopez-Ruiz v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the effect of § 363(m) is not limited to appeals of sale order itself where sale order depends on other orders on appeal
• “[A]rguments raised in a perfunctory manner, such as in a footnote, are waived.” (quotation and emphasis omitted)
• “But, [a]rguments raised in a perfunctory manner, such as in a footnote, are waived.” (quotation and citation omitted; brackets and italics in original)
• “Arguments raised in a perfunctory manner, such as in a footnote, are waived.” (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted)
• “Arguments raised in a perfunctory manner, such as in a footnote, are waived.” (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted)
• “[A]rguments raised in a perfunctory manner, such as in a footnote, are waived.” (quotation and emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).