Lopez, Joseph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that District Judges need not perform each step of the Rule 702 analysis when it is not specifically requested by a party
• stating that the defendant’s “focus on scientific-reliability factors is misplaced” when the detective’s “expert testimony was based on his extensive training and experience. . . . [which] are proper foundations for expert testimony”
• drawing line between “sugges- tive” statements and those so “facially and ‘powerfully in- criminating’ as to be considered” confessions (quoting United States v. Volpendesto, 746 F.3d 273, 291 (7th Cir. 2014)
• drawing line between “sugges- tive” statements and those so “facially and ‘powerfully in- criminating’ as to be considered” confessions (quoting United States v. Volpendesto, 746 F.3d 273, 291 (7th Cir. 2014)
• drawing line between “sugges- tive” statements and those so “facially and ‘powerfully in- criminating’ as to be considered” confessions (quoting United States v. Volpendesto, 746 F.3d 273, 291 (7th Cir. 2014)
• drawing line between “sugges- tive” statements and those so “facially and ‘powerfully in- criminating’ as to be considered” confessions (quoting United States v. Volpendesto, 746 F.3d 273, 291 (7th Cir. 2014)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).