Lopez Feliciano v. Calderon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a single flooding does not constitute a taking if the plaintiff cannot demonstrate that such flooding will inevitably recur
• “It is well settled that consequential damages form no basis for such a recovery [under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment].”
• “It is well settled that consequential damages form no basis for such a recovery.”
• “One flooding does not constitute a taking and the plaintiffs have failed to show by their evidence that the flooding which occurred in 1949 will inevitably recur. This fact is essential to prove a taking.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).