Loparex, LLC v. MPI Release Technologies, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding attorneys’ fees were not recoverable in blacklisting claim and distinguishing McCabe, finding there was no conflict between the Indiana blacklisting statutes necessitating in pari materia construction
• “Thus, in the absence of statutory authority or an agreement between the parties to the contrary—or an equitable exception—a prevailing party has no right to recover attorney fees from the opposition.”
• “[t]he GWDS eontain[s] explicit statutory language permitting an award of fees.”
• “ c[I]f there is any reasonable basis for grouping together in one act various matters of the same nature, and the public cannot be deceived thereby, the act is valid.’ ” (quoting Stith Petroleum Co. v. Dep’t of Audit & Control, 211 Ind. 400, 409, 5 N.E.2d 517, 521 (1937))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).