Lopapa v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) qualifies as a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A)
• holding that attempted bank robbery by force and violence, or by intimidation in violation of § 2113(a) is a crime of violence
• holding federal bank robbery in violation of § 2113(a) is a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A)
• noting that all Courts of Appeal to have addressed the issue agree that bank robbery by intimidation is a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A)
• noting that all Courts of Appeal to have addressed the issue agree that bank robbery by intimidation is a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A)
• “Where -- as here -- the testimony concerns impact weeks and months after the crime had undisputedly ended, it likely is only minimally probative of whether [the defendant] acted ‘by intimidation’ during the robbery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).