Skip to main content
· 1/31/1995

Lonza, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 1098
  • 16 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2551
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1821
  • 1995 WL 37692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The common meaning of a tariff term, once established, remains controlling until a subsequent change in statute compels a revised construction of the term’s meaning.” (emphasis added)
  • “While the Explanatory Notes do not constitute controlling legislative history, they do offer guidance in interpreting HTS[US] subheadings.”
  • “While the Explanatory Notes do not constitute controlling legislative history, they do offer guidance in interpreting HTS[US] subheadings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Plager, Cowen, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.