Skip to main content
· 7/21/1995

Lonnie L. Wharf v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation, Lonnie L. Wharf v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation

Citations

  • 60 F.3d 631
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 116
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 9713
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5684
  • 154 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2051
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18432
  • 1995 WL 429068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying rescue doctrine where rescuer was injured while attempting to free his coworker who was “trapped in [a] frozen ballast in a railroad car”
  • setting forth the standard for granting a motion for a new trial due to “fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct”
  • “The standards for granting new trials are essentially the same under both rules, although a Rule 59 motion, because it must be made within 10 days, may require a slightly lower showing than a motion under Rule 60.”
  • “We remand for a new trial on damages 14 only.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Hall, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.