Longworth v. Department of State Highways

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing the joining of cases under MCL 600.6421 as a “consolidation” for reasons of efficiency
• under Tuttle, since the defendant's liability arose from the negligent maintenance of the highway, and not from a motor vehicle, the no-fault act was inapplicable
• under Tuttle, since the defendant’s liability arose from the negligent maintenance of the highway, and not from a motor vehicle, the no-fault act was inapplicable
• Violation of a court rule will not necessarily warrant reversal unless the violation prejudiced a party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).