Longo Electrical Co. v. Dumais

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although defendant believed that the $1,248.70 bill was too high, there was no dispute as to the actual amount of the bill; and, therefore, defendant’s payment of $846.70 did not constitute an accord and satisfaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Goes v. Feldman
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-07-11· cited 51×
• Cuddy v. A&E Mechanical, Inc.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-10-31· cited 5×
• Marcellino v. Carma, Inc.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1975-03-13· cited 1×
• Premier Capital, Inc. v. Dolan
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 1998-09-15

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Russell v. Bond & Goodwin Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1931-09-10· cited 22×
• Champlin v. Jackson
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-03-31· cited 20×
• Shumaker v. Lucerne-in-Maine Community Ass'n
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1931-04-01· cited 18×
• MacDonald v. Kavanaugh
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1927-05-19· cited 14×
• Moss v. Goldstein
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1926-01-06· cited 13×
• Puritan Wool Co. v. Winsted Hosiery Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1928-05-24· cited 6×

Other cases named Longo Electrical Co. v. Dumais

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Longo Electrical Co. v. Dumais
  Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1970-01-15