Longino v. Shreveport Traction Co.
Citations
- 120 La. 803
- 45 So. 732
- 1908 La. LEXIS 573
Syllabus
<p>1. Appeal — Review—Conflicting Evidence.</p> <p>Where the evidence is conflicting, the verdict of the jury, approved by the trial judge, is entitled to great weight.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 3, Appeal and Error, § 3949.]</p> <p>2. Tbial — Rebuttal Evidence.</p> <p>Evidence in rebuttal should be confined to new matter brought out by the defendant.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 46, Trial, §§ 146-155.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “That Plaintiff[] may not prefer the venue or process by which the judicial forfeiture proceedings would follow is of little moment to the Court…. A clear and adequate alternative judicial forum exists to determine whether [the Cargo] should be forfeited.”
- same, with respect to the APA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Land
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.