Longever v. Revere Copper & Brass Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting products liability claim against employer and stating that implicit in the dual capacity argument is a dissatisfaction with the workers’ compensation scheme which is properly addressed to the legislature and not the courts
• court rejected the employee’s contention that worker’s compensation exclusivity did not apply since the employer wore two hats as: (1) an employer and (2
• “Deficiencies in the compensation awards pursuant to the [workers’ compensation] statute are matters of concern for the Legislature”
• “Among the common law duties placed on an employer was the responsibility to provide a safe place to work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).