Longbehn v. Schoenrock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that calling a person a pedophile was defamatory per se
• stating that a jury’s verdict should not be disturbed “if it can be sustained on any reasonable theory of the evidence” (quotation omitted)
• stating that a jury’s verdict should not be overturned “if it can be sustained on any reasonable theory of the evidence” (quotation omitted)
• applying de novo standard in reviewing grant of JMOL

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).