Long v. Turk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that son’s criminal act of killing an individual did not excuse father’s liability for negligent entrustment of the gun
• applying Second Restatement to claim that special care must be used regarding inherently dangerous items
• court had \no difficulty concluding that a .357 Magnum handgun is a dangerous instrumentality\ which requires the highest degree of care in safeguarding
• court had \no difficulty concluding that a .357 Magnum handgun is a dangerous instrumentality\ which requires the highest degree of care in safeguarding
• father had duty to keep gun out of his son’s possession even if he believed his son was able to use gun responsibly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).