Skip to main content
· 6/23/2004

Long v. Ostroff

Citations

  • 854 A.2d 524
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 240
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to quash an appeal where numerous defects in the appellant’s brief did not prevent meaningful review
  • declining to quash the appeal where numerous defects in the appellant’s brief did not prevent meaningful review
  • applying section 5524(7) to an intentional inflection of emotional distress claim
  • merits of appeal considered despite party violating rules of appellate procedure where violations did not impede review
  • merits of appeal considered despite party violating rules of appellate procedure where violations did not impede review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Todd, Panella, and Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.