Skip to main content
· 8/28/2006

Long v. McAllister-Long

Citations

  • 221 S.W.3d 1
  • 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “[a] hold harmless agreement ... is generally classified as an indemnity against liability” agreement
  • explaining that with the two “notable exceptions” of child support and alimony, which remain modifiable by the courts, “the agreements in a marital dissolution agreement are enforceable contract obligations.”
  • requiring a clear and unambiguous order in a case involving criminal contempt
  • requiring a clear and unambiguous order in a case involving criminal contempt
  • “To the extent that obligations in a marital dissolution agreement retain their contractual character, they should be construed and enforced like other contracts.”
  • “A marital dissolution agreement, like any other contract, contains an implied covenant of good faith and fair -16- dealing both in the performance and the interpretation of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Cain, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.