Long v. Marino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that the law will not support a contract founded on the immoral consideration of unmarried cohabitation
• applying O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33 two-year statute of limitations to a battery claim involving alleged sexual abuse
• affirming the grant of summary judgment because the last occurrence of sexual abuse was more than two years before the action was filed, so the tort claim was time-barred under the two-year statute of limitation under OCGA § 9-3-33
• claim that defendant had “an implied duty to provide financial support in return for [the plaintiff’s] agreement to live with [defendant] and maintain sexual relations” barred as a meretricious relationship
• claim that defendant had “an implied duty to provide financial support in return for [the plaintiff’s] agreement to live with [defendant] and maintain sexual relations” barred as a meretricious relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).