Long v. Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [decision to award] alimony is [a] matter with[in] the discretion of the trial judge, to be exercised in the light of the facts of each particular case, and will not be disturbed on appeal unless an abuse of discretion is shown.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dearybury v. Dearybury
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-26· cited 64×
• McKnight v. McKnight
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-12-13· cited 23×
• Bannen v. Bannen
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-04· cited 22×
• Wooten v. Wooten
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-05· cited 9×
• McKenzie v. McKenzie
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-07-06· cited 8×
• Calcutt v. Calcutt
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-08-30· cited 8×
• Wooten v. Wooten
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-10· cited 4×
• Martin v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-10· cited 3×
• McManus v. McManus
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-02-02

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Porter v. Porter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-08-05· cited 34×
• Lee v. Lee
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-01-24· cited 28×
• Murdock v. Murdock
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-11-13· cited 26×
• Taylor v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-12-31· cited 13×
• Moore v. Moore
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1959-12-15· cited 9×
• Ex Parte Atkinson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-07-18· cited 9×
• Dobson v. Atkinson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-11-12· cited 7×