Long v. Insight Communications of Central Ohio, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that for a provider to knowingly or intentionally violate the Stored Communications Act’s disclosure provision, it must know “that it was divulging information” as well as “the facts that made the disclosure unauthorized”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).