· 1/6/1897
Long v. Hunter
Citations
- 48 S.C. 179
- 26 S.E. 228
- 1897 S.C. LEXIS 82
Syllabus
<p>1. Motion — Peeadings—Objection.—There is no rale requiring an attorney to move to have the grounds of his opponent’s motion, to make a pleading more definite and certain, specifically stated, nor is he required to object to the insufficiency of such motion until opponent has finished his argument.</p> <p>2. Ibid. — Ibid.—Order.—Requisites of motion to require pleadings to be made more definite and certain, and form of order thereon, stated.</p>
Judges: Gary
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.