Long v. Hogan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “complaint gave the ten-day notice required by OCGA § 13-1-11 (a) (3)”
• holding notice requirement met by filing of a complaint
• court erred in awarding $10,195.40 in attorney fees under OCGA § 13-1-11 where principal and interest amounted to only $6,259.12
• “Hogan in the complaint gave the ten-day notice required by [] § 13-1-11(a)(3)”
• “ten-day notice in complaint is sufficient”
• “[T]en-day notice in complaint is sufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).