Long v. Dunlop Sports Group Americas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that DOL regulations expressly provide that a “‘termination’ does not occur simply because an employee no longer performs the work that the employee formerly performed.”
• holding that the employer’s liability is reduced by “‘any wages paid by the employer to the employee,’ but not reduced by wages the employee may earn from a new employer”
• “[P]aying all benefits and wages for 60 days without requiring work in exchange entirely accords with the language, purpose, and structure of the WARN Act.”
• “The ordinary meaning of ‘employment termination’ does not encompass a situation in which an employer continues to pay its employees full wages and benefits.”
• “[I]n the WARN Act, Congress sought to protect employees’ expectation of wages and benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).