Long v. Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[N]either the language of the Act, nor the legislative history explicitly indicates whether the Act should apply retroactively.”
• “[T]he alleged misconduct by defendants was proscribed at the time it allegedly occurred. Under Peppertree, no new obligation or standard has been imposed on the defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).