Long & Berry v. Garnett
Citations
- 45 Tex. 400
Syllabus
<p>1. Final judgment. — A judgment was rendered against several defen dants, sued on a promissory note, and a new trial as to part of the defendants was granted: Held, That the legal effect of such an » order was to so far vacate the entire judgment as to render the issuance of execution thereon invalid; nor is such a judgment final, from which an appeal can be taken.</p> <p>2. Same. — Under the statute, only one final judgment can be rendered in a case, and that judgment is not divisible.</p>
Judges: Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Linn v. ArambouldTexas Supreme Court· 1881-10-07· cited 100×
- J. M. Hamilton & Co. v. PrescottTexas Supreme Court· 1889-04-26· cited 99×
- Wootters v. KauffmanTexas Supreme Court· 1887-03-11· cited 54×
- Howard Gault & Son, Inc. v. First National Bank of HerefordCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-05-19· cited 11×
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. KeithTexas Commission of Appeals· 1925-06-27· cited 11×
- Finlen v. SkellyIllinois Supreme Court· 1923-10-20· cited 9×
- McClaren Rubber Co. v. Williams Auto Supply Co. of Big SpringCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1934-12-21· cited 4×
- Rutta v. LafferaCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1883-02-03
- Hendricks v. City of ShermanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1949-04-15
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.