Skip to main content
· 12/5/1975

Lonergan & Thomas, Inc. v. McCullough

Citations

  • 134 Vt. 605
  • 365 A.2d 276
  • 1975 Vt. LEXIS 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “evaluat[ing] the plausibility of the remaining allegations” requires “assuming their veracity, construing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff’s favor”
  • explaining that under step three of the motion-to-dismiss analysis, a court “evaluates the plausibility of the remaining allegations” while “assuming their veracity, construing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff’s favor”
  • “pleading[s] receive[] the benefit of reasonable inferences at the motion~to-dismiss stage”
  • “[D]ictionaries from the time of a statute's enactment illuminate an undefined term's common and approved meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.