· 1/11/2010
Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLC
Citations
- 594 F.3d 383
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 631
- 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 167
- 2010 WL 60897
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court considering a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is “limited to the complaint, any documents attached to the complaint, and any documents attached to the motion to dismiss that are central to the claim and referenced by the complaint”
- alleging that the Officers “beat and subdued him,” without specifying whether they beat him while subduing him or afterwards
- explaining that a court’s review on 12(b)(6) motion “is limited to the complaint, any documents attached to the complaint, and any documents attached to the a section 1983 claim, a plaintiff must (1
- noting that our review “is limited to the complaint, any documents attached to the complaint, and any documents attached to the motion to dismiss that are central to the claim and referenced by the complaint”
- noting that a court, in evaluating a motion to dismiss, can consider “any documents attached to the complaint, and any documents attached to the motion to dismiss that are central to the claim and referenced by the complaint”
- noting that a court’s review on a 12(b)(6) motion “is limited to the complaint, any documents attached to the complaint, and any documents attached to the motion to dismiss that are central to the claim and referenced by the complaint”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Garza, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.