London v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allowing UM coverage to be extended for injuries sustained by a person who is not an insured under the claimant’s policy would create coverage under the statute where none previously existed
• interpreting UM statute providing coverage \for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to recover damages ... because of bodily injury ... including death resulting therefrom ...\
• interpreting UM statute providing coverage \for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to recover damages ... because of bodily injury ... including death resulting therefrom ...\
• considering a similar UM dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).