· 1/9/2007
London Market Insurers v. Superior Court
Citations
- 53 Cal. Rptr. 3d 154
- 146 Cal. App. 4th 648
- 2007 Daily Journal DAR 396
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 309
- 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 21
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the different approaches that courts have taken around the country
- discussing the different approaches that courts have taken around the country
- “In 2 determining if a provision is ambiguous, we consider not only the 3 face of the contract but also any extrinsic evidence that 4 supports a reasonable interpretation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Suzukawa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.