Skip to main content
· 1/9/2007

London Market Insurers v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 53 Cal. Rptr. 3d 154
  • 146 Cal. App. 4th 648
  • 2007 Daily Journal DAR 396
  • 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 309
  • 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the different approaches that courts have taken around the country
  • discussing the different approaches that courts have taken around the country
  • “In 2 determining if a provision is ambiguous, we consider not only the 3 face of the contract but also any extrinsic evidence that 4 supports a reasonable interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Suzukawa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.