Londoff v. Vuylsteke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and conversion where the fee-splitting agreement did not comply with Rule 4-1.5(e)
• affirming trial court’s dismissal of plaintiffs claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and conversion where the fee-splitting agreement did not comply with Rule 4 — 1.5(e)
• “[Plaintiff] contends the facts show he was jointly responsible. However, the rule requires a written agreement with the client in which each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for representation.”
• “The facts that [plaintiff] did a few hours of work on the case before he referred it to defendants and that he may thereafter have been liable for malpractice damages or a portion of the costs do not satisfy the rule’s requirement of a written contract.”
• \The facts that [plaintiff] did a few hours of work on the case before he referred it to defendants and that he may thereafter have been liable for malpractice damages or a portion of the costs do not satisfy the rule's requirement of a written contract.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).