Lomison v. Faust

Citations

• 145 Pa. 8
• 23 A. 377
• 1892 Pa. LEXIS 753

Syllabus

<p>1. The unsupported testimony on oath of a judgment defendant, alleging fraud in the procurement of the note with warrant of attorney on which the judgment is entered, opposed by the testimony on oath of the plaintiff, is insufficient to authorize the opening of the judgment to let the defendant into a defence.*</p> <p>2. Where the defendant, on the purchase of land from the plaintiff, executed to the latter a purchase money mortgage and bond, and, upon a judgment confessed on the bond, the land, though greatly improved by the defendant, was sold for a trifle to the plaintiff, there is no relief from the unsatisfied judgment.</p>