Lomholt v. Burt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding any Confrontation Clause error from children testifying via closed- circuit television was harmless where defendant’s confession and other corroborating evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction
• “In short, this court agrees with [the federal magistrate’s report and recommendation] that the trial court’s findings were ‘wrong,’ or at least, were based on evidence that this court would not find satisfactory if this court were the finder of fact.”
• psychologist's recommendation that it would be \very traumatic\ for child to testify in defendant's presence, based upon her observation that child became \very anxious\ when talking about defendant, justified trial court's authorization of closed circuit procedures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).