Skip to main content
· 4/20/1964

Lomax v. Russell

Citations

  • 377 U.S. 912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court did not consider plaintiffs’ argument that arbitration clause violated Rule 15c2-2 because “whatever effect Rule 15c2-2 may have had before its rescission, it can no longer be used as a defense to arbitration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.